Requesting the testimony of
unsworn witnesses Mr. Kato, the former Ehime Governor and Mr. Maekawa,
the former Vice Minister (事務次官)of Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology (MEXT) on the issue of Kake-gakuen
Joint Review Board of
Educational Scientific Committee and Cabinet Committee
Aoyama
I am Aoyama,
LDP, Kokoro. I am going to ask questions not for the sake of party
politics but simply for the interest of Japan. Thank you (bow)
Before making
questions I would like to express my condolences from my soul
for the people who lost lives and their surviving families in
the heavy rain disaster which attacked Kyushu again (bow).
Well, I appreciate
Mr. Kato Moriyuki, the former Ehime governor, and Mr. Maekawa
Kihei, the former Vice Minister of Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, for attending this Diet
deliberation as witness (bow). The two of you were serving in
the same ministry, and Mr. Kato is senior to Mr. Maekawa so I
introduced Mr. Kato first.
Well, now I begin
with that; in Japan today, serious, new crisis began to appear
such as avian influenza, foot and mouth disease, BSE and mad cow
disease. The infection route of avian influenza, which was “from
birds to birds” in the past, now is in new terrifying phase at
least found in China, where it developed to “birds to humans”,
furthermore “humans to humans” that caused death of humans
eventually. This proved that virus of avian influenza is mutated
repeatedly and getting its infectiousness higher. In Japan we
have to keep preparing against the risk of probability that
highly pathogenic avian influenza spreads to humans.
And
in Miyazaki we have already experienced the outbreaks of the
foot and mouth disease in cows and pigs that caused tremendous
damages to cattle farms. This is also virus. In addition,
mad-cow disease had developed in Hokkaido, Chiba, Kanagawa, and
Kumamoto.
The
media seem to forget about it and do not report it anymore,
therefore the people began to lack a sense of crisis, that is
more serious matter.
Before I became a member of parliament, I was engaging in the
business of crisis management in private sector for long time. I
recognized very well how sacred of the duty of the government
and parliament is, to protect the people from the new risk of
virus, which is derived from animals.
From such point of
view, before the so-called Kake-gakuen issue arose, I, as a
humble member of experts of private sector, was working with
municipality and government as necessary and have been facing
the shortage problem of veterinarian who can handle the animal
virus.
According to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fisheries, among 39,000 veterinarians in Japan, pets related
veterinarians accounts for 30 percent, the highest, and public
veterinarians who are responsible for epidemic prevention and
improvement of livestock, 9 percent only.
Before my
questioning today I inquired the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries again, and got an answer as that;
The
industrial animal veterinarian is, a veterinarian who can handle
the virus as mentioned before. In several areas the positions of
industrial animal veterinarians are not filled satisfactory,
therefore students of veterinarian are offered the loan of
education fund under the condition that he or she must be going
to work in the local area. It shows the difficulty to secure the
industrial animal veterinarians in those areas, that was the
answer from the Ministry. In Ehime prefecture the number of such
loan of education fund is 9 cases. The third highest across
Japan. In Tokyo no such loan case found.
Mr. Ogawa Ryosuke,
Minister's Secretariat, the government witness of Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, am I correct? Please answer
me in short.”
Ogawa
Ryosuke, Minister's Secretariat, the government witness of Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF)
I respond to
your question, sir. Concerning the project to loan the
education fund to veterinary students as you mentioned, 16
municipalities enforced the project in 2016 and in Ehime 9 cases
implemented, the third highest in Japan.
Aoyama
I ask the
witness Mr. Maekawa. To my understanding, you made a statement
that Japan has no shortage problem of veterinarian, therefore it
makes administration to be distorted if Kake-gakuen creates a
new veterinarian faculty in Imabari city in Ehime. Do you know
the real situation as I mentioned? (buzzing in the hall)
Witness Maekawa Kihei, the
former Vice Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology (MEXT)
Well, no, sir.
Well, there is an issued notice that any application for new
establishment of veterinary faculty should not be accepted.
Against the notice whether a special case should be provided or
not, the notice should be abolished or not, or the policy to
control the number of students who enter the veterinary faculty
should be abolished or not – those issues should be discussed in
policy debate. It can be discussed in a issue of National
Strategy Zone, or discussed in general.
And, the issue whether the deregulation should be done or not,
and the issue whether the new establishment of veterinary
faculty should be permitted to Kake-gakuen as a result of the
deregulation or not, are in different dimensions. The part,
which I believe distorted, is a process in which Kake-gakuen
alone was permitted the new establishment of veterinary faculty
as a result of deregulation. I think that part is problematic,
and doubt its fairness or transparency and should be
investigated.
Aoyama
As a matter of
fact, the statement made by the witness Mr. Maekawa was just as
expected. I will ask you about it later again.
Now, witness Mr. Kato, you have been facing the problem of
veterinarian shortage in the front line of the municipality.
What is the real condition? And what do you think about the
statement made by the witness Mr. Maekawa?
Witness Kato Moriyuki
(former governor of Ehime)
I respond to
your questions, sir.
Before that I would like to express my gratitude wholeheartedly
for inviting me as witness.
As long as 10 years
ago, I remember that I, as a governor of Ehime, applied for the
attraction of veterinary faculty, under the name of Special
Deregulation Zone then. In those days our application was
totally ignored and now after 10 years since then so many people
began interested in this issue – I felt strange.
In
those times, as the governor of Ehime I was responsible for many
issues including the life of Ehime people, their health,
properties, promotion of cattle business, food hygiene, etc.
Among that the toughest problem was the prevention against the
possible infection in Shikoku of avian influenza, or
foot-and-mouth disease, or the prevention of BSE influence in
Japan.
Shikoku is a small island and/yet I believe that it is most
manageable to prevent those infectious diseases. Meanwhile the
US had experienced mad cow disease and started to emphasize the
education of veterinary based on the life science as well as the
measures against infectious diseases by increasing significantly
the number of students and new establishment of three veterinary
faculties.
Watching the US
which is tackling the issue with full efforts, I was frustrated
in Japan where nobody cared about this issue. At least 10 years
ago I challenged it with the dream and hope of the people in
Ehime, and in Imabari area. We applied against the thick rock of
regulation and were rejected repeatedly, then finally it is
realized in the frame of
(original word; international ) National Strategy Zone. I
am very pleased now.
For the statement
made by Mr. Maekawa that administration was distorted, as
remarked before, I would object by saying that; as far as the
veterinary faculty is concerted, we have been enduring the
rejection for 10 years due to the massive rock of regulation,
and now the National Strategy Zone drilled a hole, that is, the
distorted administration was corrected – that is the right
expression, I believe. (buzzing in hall)
Aoyama
I see. The
statements of witnesses Mr. Maekawa and Mr. Kato were completely
conflicting. I will follow the matter later, after I asked one
more question. Regarding the issue of veterinarian I would like
to ask both of the witnesses.
There is another problem in the education of veterinarian.
Currently the regulated number of student is 930, nevertheless
the number is padded to 1200. If the MEXT considers the demand
is balanced, it doesn't make sense. It means 23% of padded
students is ordinary practice.
I
interviewed a number of people at universities. And I found that
many students cannot enter the class room and standing in the
corridor, just observing the lesson. In actual practice, which
is most important in the education, some students are peeking
from behind – this differs from university to university, but I
heard this happens often.
I
heard that currently MEXT is engaged in correction of the padded
number of student. I heard it from MEXT. But if the number is
corrected, 270 of veterinarian per year, almost one fourth of
veterinarians in new generation will be decreased. Well, is this
not a proof that the education of veterinarian is not
sufficiently given by the current universities, that is, the
universities of veterinarian are in shortage. Witness Mr.
Maekawa, what is your opinion about this?
Witness Maekawa
Well, the matter
of correction of the padded students in private universities is
existing as general matter. This is an issue to be discussed as
well as the way to utilize the government subsidies to private
universities.
However, the demand for veterinarian and, desirable number of
students in veterinary faculty for responding the demand, should
be discussed politically, well, and the control of the regulated
number should be implemented politically, for the time being,
that is, it is not desirable to abolish it all at a time, I
think so personally.
For
the matter of veterinarian, if it is necessary to increase the
number of student, that is not determined yet, but if it is
necessary to increase the number of veterinarian in education,
there is another way that is to increase the number of student
in existing universities – some of the existing universities
have enough staff, furthermore, the regulated staff, that is,
structure of instructor system can be improved.
It
is much more difficult to create a completely new veterinary
faculty, and an issue how to fill the instructors of the new
university must be very difficult problem to solve. If you bring
the new instructors to the new faculty from the existing
universities, the system of instructors in the existing
universities will be weakened. There is such problem, therefore,
if the matter is simply to increase the number of students,
well, generally, to increase the regulated number of student in
the existing universities needs lower cost. As a matter of fact,
such means is adopted for doctors to decrease the number of
supply. I think we have to think this issue politically
considering such choice included. (Mr. Kato, former Ehime
governor, shaking his head with wry smile.)
Aoyama
I
see. I listened humbly what the witness Mr. Maekawa stated, that
is, in short, reinforcement of the given system is desirable. If
it is feasible no problem, but if so the current situation of
padded students couldn't be happened, for all the educational
institutes of veterinarian are working with resolutions. Based
on that, I'd like to ask the witness Mr. Kato about this issue.
Kato
Since we have
started to apply for the Strategy Zone we have met a number of
rejection. We tried several approaches and confronted the most
negative opinion which came from the Japan Veterinary Medical
Association (JVMA).We didn't have any direct contact with them
then, but I found their totally negative opinion in their
website concerning the new establishment of veterinary faculty.
Their message is that, in short, they would do the education
satisfactory, therefore, do not do anything unnecessary.
I
have been wondering since then that – in my term I called Kanto
from Hakone-no-Sekisho (Hakone Checkpoint) to the east – 80
percent of (total) regulated number of student is designated in
Kanto, the area from Hakone-no-Sekisho to the east, and only 20
percent in Kansai, the area from Hakone-no-Sekisho to the west.
And the private universities have padded students, so actually
80 percent or possibly 90 percent of educated veterinarian are
collected in Kanto, the area from Hakone-no-Sekisho to the east.
Empty area is Shikoku. We can't secure veterinarians. I, as a
governor of the prefecture, tried possible means to invite
veterinarians. For example, the local officials must pass a
competitive examination as a principle, nevertheless we offer
the veterinarians no-test, so please come. But they don't.
From the point of negative view of JVMA, it is because we don't
treat them well;
Can
Ehime prefecture or Shikoku make the compensation system of
veterinarian better than those of government official
veterinarian? And if you can do it, are you not going to
decrease their salary once the number of veterinarian is filled?
For the matter
of payment they say that Ehime's payment is low that's why
nobody want to go and they say the students don't go Shikoku
because we don't offer them scholarship. They say, “All the
students come to Tokyo, then we educated them and make them
return.”
Does it make sense?
We
have been kept watching JVMA who oppose us about the
establishment of new faculty.
I
am afraid to say that, the JVMA is leaving the regulated number
of instructor in universities, as it is, from 10 years ago until
today, saying that no new instructors should be made, while the
US is tackling hard with this issue.
In
this case too, I can't understand why they try to stop us to
increase the number of veterinarian instructor for prevention
against infectious diseases, or to create staff for wide range
study such as life science or the study of drug discovery with
animal experiment. If they insist so, I would like to say, why
they didn't make well-staffed themselves to follow the example
of US for these 10 years? They leave as it is, nevertheless,
they say us not to create. It does not make sense, I have been
thinking so.
If
you allow me to spare your time – in the end of my term of
governor, Democratic Party had taken the government. The
Democratic Party said this issue could not be solved by Liberal
Democratic Party, and they started to work. The stage of closed
door improved to a stage to consider for the realization. Good,
and I handed the matter to the next governor.
However, when the Liberal Democratic Party came back to the
government, we found nothing moved. They had done nothing,
nonetheless they try to stop Imabari doing something. That is
advocates of vested interests – is it so? I have been frustrated
for long.
Now this issue is
taken up in the National Strategy Zone, and I, who has been
involving in this issue, joined a member of supporters as a
special adviser of Chamber of Commerce in Imabari city.
Watching this issue, I think, the most important thing is to
educate veterinarians for the advanced science which is
comparable to the US, and for the measures against infectious
diseases, on which our Japanese lives depend on. Untouched this
issue, they say, Imabari No, Imabari No, because it is done with
Kake first – I don't understand.
I did not consider
Kake first. It happened a member of the prefectural assembly in
Ehime who was elected in Imabari, and the manager of Kake-gakuen
were friends that led to the plan and I jumped at the
opportunity. (buzzing in hall). Is it not allowed? Because they
were friends, so everything is wrong?
Reflecting like that, I, for the first time, revealed a part of
my heart by borrowing this opportunity. (buzzing in hall)
Aoyama
The witness Mr.
Kato was serving as high as Chief Cabinet Secretary in former
Ministry of Education and as I mentioned before, he was senior
to the witness Mr. Maekawa.
There was a real discrepancy between the vested interests which
MEXT and former ME have been protecting as well as the wall of
regulation, and, the municipalities, especially local people,
their duty to prepare risks – Mr. Kato told it to us in modesty
and openly.
The undersecretary
Mr. Maekawa told that the problem is “Kake first”, well, my
given time is getting less, but I want to ask about this issue.
That is; the process – regarding to new establishment of
veterinary faculty in Okayama University of Science -
Kake-gakuen in Imabari, Ehime, a number of documents were
discussed. There are generally full of memos running around in
the ministry, that is what I knew well since my time of
political reporter.
I
think, it is better not to depend on such memos but to check
carefully the cabinet decisions or the minutes on the decision
of National Strategy or other revealed documents in public in
order to make clear of the process – well, personally I think
the process is very clear.
First, MEXT issued the notice on this issue in 2003, which the
witness Mr. Maekawa mentioned.
This notice – the members in this room today know the notice,
but for the people in general this is not familiar – this is not
a law, nor government ordinance, nor ministerial ordinance, but
a kind of order, well, order might be too strong word, but
something having significant power, which the office can issue.
I was a reporter once but I say honestly I didn't check those
notices. So the people in general come to know the reality of
those notices only when they became those concerned.
So
I have to point out the notice, by which the new establishment
of university such as veterinarian is not allowed in fact, was
issued in 2003. Well, for the sake of fairness I say that this
is not only for veterinarian but for 4 types of profession, mr.
doctor, mr. dentist, mr. veterinarian and mr. sailor.
And, sorry, well, before the notice in 2003, they took such
posture already, and it was confirmed again by the notice,
therefore, for half of century, any university and faculty was
not newly established at all.
Against this, as the witness Mr. Kato mentioned, Ehime
prefecture and Imabari city jointly invited a veterinary
faculty, and Kake-gakuen alone responded in 2007, three years
after the notice.
The
witness Mr. Kato told of 10 years struggling. He didn't use the
word struggling, but his message was very exact in chronological
order.
For 8 years
after that, not only Kake-gakuen but the municipality, as shown
as Mr. Kato, the governor of Ehime prefecture then, who is now
presenting here, have been working for it. As a result, it was
approved by the Cabinet that, if 4 conditions, including the
proof of new demand, are satisfied, a new school of veterinarian
is allowed to be established in the National Strategy Zone. It
was two year ago, June 30th 2015.
In
the previous year the basic policy of the National Strategy Zone
was approved by the Cabinet so anyone can read the policy.
In
the document it mentioned that, well, this is related with the
matter that Yamamoto Minister told before, uh, no answer is
needed, sir, that is; if a ministry or government office has a
difficulty to ease a regulation, the ministry or the government
office is obliged to explain its justifiable reason. In
technical word it is called a burden of proof. That is included
in the policy.
Accordingly the
responsibility, that MEXT must explain whether new demand for
veterinarian is existing or not, based on the 4 conditions as
mentioned before, till the end of 2015, that was till 31st
March last year, arose practically. However, MEXT didn't
complete it till the end of the last year. Watching it or not,
Kyoto Sangyo University rose its hand. It was March 2016.
Meanwhile, the
government, in this case Abe government, did not conclude this a
defeat of MEXT and gave a half of year and on 16th
September 2016 they hold a hearing of working group of National
Strategy Zone. At the hearing a deputy director said that; the
burden of proof whether new demand is existing or not, is on the
university, well, in my translation, the party who wants to
create new university or new faculty has the burden, but MEXT
has not.
However, the party of working group, for example, Mr. Hara
(Eiji) who attended here as a witness, stated that, the burden
of proof is on MEXT. Mr. Hara's word is totally opposite. He
said that the burden of proof has MEXT but they said opposite.
(buzzing in hall)
This minutes can be read by anybody, so if you read the minutes
you will find that MEXT did not make objection at all. Therefore
the discussion was completed then.
The reason MEXT has
the burden of proof is that they have the total power to permit
the new establishment of university or faculty. MEXT know it
very well that's why they did not argue and eventually it is
concluded.
I
would say again. This is not just a my guess nor my selfish
logic – if media reads the context they will come to understand.
Now, the issue
of internal document, very controversial document, which is
claimed that the document implies the Prime Minister's
intention. According to the witness Mr. Maekawa's answer Mr.
Maekawa himself seemed recognized the document a memo, and the
memo was made only 10 days after the conclusion, concluded in
fact. It was 26th September 2016.
That is, the negotiation in the director class, in this case
assistant director in practical, that was concluded in the
level, is intervened by Prime Minister – that is unthinkable to
the people in the administration. Actually I asked about this
all the acquaintances in ministries including foreign ministry
and ministry of defense, whom I knew since my reporter's age and
nobody said it could be. Then, why it arose as an issue at the
diet (jeering)? – rather, by this, a doubt is presented to me.
Now, for the sake
of fairness, I say this is my guess, that this memo is a
document for internal MEXT in order to excuse themselves, that
“we were defeated but it was due to Prime Minister's intention.”
Isn't it the most reasonable explanation? (buzzing in hall).
Aside from the matter that my analysis is right or not, a
reacted party was Japan Veterinary Medical Association, as
mentioned by the witness Mr. Kato.
Mr.
Kurauchi Isao, the head of the Veterinary Medical Association
was interviewed by Nishi-Nippon Newspaper.
After the decision of deregulation was made, the party of JVMA
realized keenly that the matter was concluded once and for all
at the hearing of the working group, therefore he said (in the
interview) that;
“After
the deregulation was decided, we asked to make it one school,
one school only at the very best. If we cannot prevent the new
school establishment, we thought that we must restrict it to one
school only. ”
Please check this also by the original source of the interview.
So accordingly, in
the year, in the autumn of November of this year, Kyoto Sangyo
University, who has been newly applying, withdrew the
application, – well, I asked my acquaintance in Kyoto Sangyo
University, I am sorry I cannot say the person's name who
declined all requests of interview, but the person said the
University would not want to force themselves and gave up this
time, expecting for the next opportunity. This is not official
statements and I cannot prove its credibility, it is personal
remark, but after hearing the remark what do you think? Don't
you think it is very reasonable? (“Yes!” from the hall) (buzzing
in hall) (“Easy to understand!” from the hall)
And
after the withdrawal of the Kyoto Sangyo University – I don't
think the withdrawal influenced it, – next year, that is,
January of this year, Kake-gakuen was designated as Zone
operator.
Well, and, assume that, by the strong request from the
Veterinary Medical Association – well, I do not ask the question
for the sake of the Liberal Democratic Party but for the
national interest, that's why I ask (buzzing in hall) – after it
was determined to limit to one school only by lobbying of the
Veterinary Medical Association toward the political circles
including LDP, if the Kyoto Sangyo University, who had applied
last year for the first time, was selected as the one, we would
think, Why? What happened? – it could have been serious matter.
Conversely it is assumed that the decision of withdrawal of
Kyoto Sangyo University was partially influenced by the strong
lobbying of the Veterinary Medical Association. I have read
official documents repeatedly in details and I concluded so, no
other process. (buzzing in hall)
I
ask the witness Mr. Maekawa about this process. Please forgive
me if you feel my remark offensive.
Did
you know those circumstances in details when you were serving an
incumbent, that is, before you came to the parliament like this?
Maekawa
Well, ah, I, ah,
when I was working at MEXT as incumbent, there were many things
invisible. Why it was the basic premise that the date of opening
of the school was determined as April 2018? For this issue I
found no rational explanation and finally I got an explanation
that it was said by top level in the office of Prime Minister or
Prime Minister's intention – well, this should be explained by
the cabinet office, and many parts were not in charge of MEXT,
so there are many things which I have no knowledge.
However, well, ah, in Japan Revitalization Strategy Revision
2015, well, there are 4 conditions that were decided by Cabinet
in June 2015. It was a Cabinet Decision, therefore the Cabinet
Decision must be kept by those who is engaged in any ministry or
any office, or Special Zone Advisory Council, as a member of
Cabinet.
Well, in this
Cabinet decision there are 4 conditions that should be satisfied
and of which MEXT had been concerning.
Well, first, a plan by presenting party must be specified that
it is different from an existing veterinarian education. Well it
was presumed that Imabari city would present such plan. And it
is true that Imabari city presented something. Against it, what
MEXT said? Well, if you read the minutes of the working group
you will know that MEXT pointed out each of them that this or
that is done or given by existing university. Against this no
reaction came.
Therefore MEXT, well, based on the 4 conditions, well, insists
that the plan, which was presented by Imabari, does not satisfy
those conditions, but discussion did not continue since that.
After that, in anyway, it is said it should be decided. It is
said the four conditions were satisfied. Someone decided. So
that was that, MEXT insisted at the working group that the
conditions were not satisfied, you will see that if you read the
minutes. (buzzing in hall)
So, it doesn't make
sense to claim the burden of proof based on this, and, well,
first of all, which one should explain the necessity first in
the discussion in the government – which one should take the
burden of proof first, well such that, making the order of turn
is probable in the sequence of discussion.
However, as the result that the Cabinet Office won, MEXT lost,
therefore MEXT should explain to the people that they do this –
this cannot be an explanation to the people. The whereabouts of
burden of proof, and the accountability to the people are
completely different, and the accountability to the people
should be taken by the government as a whole, (jeering), well,
there is a burden of proof first and MEXT was lost in the
discussion so MEXT must explain – this shouldn't be led to such
discussion.
Aoyama
Well, as a
matter of fact I want to trust Mr. Maekawa, but your statement
is very strange, and from your speech in general I came to see
that you did not know all the processes as I mentioned, though
you did not say so. If you knew you must have said so.
And, one thing, you said that having the burden of proof and the
accountability to the people are two different things.
If
those are different things it is the end of democracy. Yes, it
is. We don't know for what purpose are we doing this
deliberation.
Regarding the
burden of proof – I don't want to say this but it is you who
switched the subjects in your talk. (buzzing in hall)
So
if you talk it with a motive, I hope you will avoid it.
And now time is
running out, therefore I'd like to hear the witness Mr. Kato
about this issue.
Kato
Well, MEXT is my
old haunt, well, ah, in a progress of the times and
international trends, I think MEXT as well as others must ask
yourself if we are in right course.
I
myself began to involve with this matter, which has been
rejected and as time passed, in parallel with our approach, the
pharmaceutical department, for example – the separation trend of
medical and dispensary practice had increased, and the students
of pharmaceutical department suddenly increased by 6000, well,
5000 something, close to 6000. The number of universities became
almost double. But for this matter, nobody cared what about the
demand, what about the supply, or what about the burden of
proof.
And
what happened now is; tens of thousand of over-supply of
pharmacist to come – what to do? that is a big problem.
On
the other hand, for the veterinary faculty it is said no money
allowed or having the burden of proof or not that I was not
involved with.
While I was
listening the discussion I think something. As far as I know,
since we presented our plan, the veterinary faculties in private
universities in Tokyo hold 45, 50 or so of professors formation
and kept it until now without responding to the progress of the
times.
Meanwhile the veterinary faculty which Imabari city is planning
now will hold a formation of 72 of professors and engage in the
life science and cli...., as well as research against infectious
diseases in various ways.
Of
course, it is likely for an existing, for example, a department
of medical faculty, to work something, but, well, what to say,
like a mean old woman's saying, the pharmaceutical department
can be created freely, but veterinary faculty No, no money
spared at all. How could such things accepted in the
internationalized age, the age we should not be left behind of
the western world. I came here to appeal that. Quibbling is
enough.
And I would like to
add this. I have been working at Kasumigaseki for 30 years. We
had done negotiations between ministries and government offices.
On behalf of our own ministries we exchanged heated arguments,
with fierce words, or occasionally like a fox borrowing lion's
authority. However, after the matters were settled, we exchanged
sake cups talking “Hey, you said such bitter words, huh?”, or
something like that, then we moved to the determined policy or
next policy. That was the culture of Kasumigaseki.
In
this case, I felt no Kasumigaseki culture. Has the time changed?
For the sake of the Japanese people, at least, we have to think,
who needs what, in the tide of time. I feel very sorry that, the
veterinary faculty is treated like a toy without essential
discussion in this way.
Aoyama
Now, 5 minutes
left.
Well, the
witness Mr. Maekawa was involved in an illegal incident of
amakudari (descent from heaven with golden parachute) and
resigned, that is public fact. Regarding the situation of
amakudari, the witness Mr. Maekawa said, at the press conference
on 23rd June, that the witness did not know the
situation in details.
Frankly I was very surprised to watch the press conference. I
saw the video as well as the documents.
If
it is true, it is nothing but abandonment of responsibility, or
negligence, of the undersecretary. If it is not true, it might
come to the critical matter, that the witness has no
understanding of, illegal, the illegality in the amakudari
mediation.
I
try to manage to spare time for Mr. Maekawa to answer but;
I
want to point out for example – Mr. Kurauchi (蔵内),
the president of the Veterinarians Association wrote his essay
called Shunkashutou “spring, summer, autumn, and winter” in the
internal magazine of the association, that; “I am trying to
improve the conditions of the existing veterinarians. For that
purpose, I oppose to increase the number of veterinarian. As a
direct approach for it, I will oppose new establishment of
university which would lead to increase of veterinarians.” – he
wrote this clearly in his essay.
Including the institutes for veterinarian education, all the
approval rights for school is in the hand of MEXT. Therefore the
schools receive the amakudari MEXT officials, and in the MEXT,
the officials including the undersecretary proceeded amakudari
to schools against the law, that's why the witness Mr. Maekawa
was resigned due to this matter.
As shown in the
Veterinary Society – I don't believe all the veterinarians
follow it, but the society's attitude to protect the existing
universities exclusively, and the issue of amakudari are not
related? That is; this is related with the darkness of Japan in
which politician, government officials, businessmen, and private
sectors, any and all sectors who try to protect their vested
interests.
On
the issue of approval for new school; MEXT would not try to
leave it to the competition by which only good schools can
survive, but try to protect the existing schools and do not ease
regulation, reasonable or not, that is the posture of MEXT
today. I worry about that again at this deliberation.
Four minutes left. Excuse me the witness Mr. Maekawa, if
possible share the time 2 minutes for each, well, excuse me,
please tell your opinion in short.
Maekawa
Well, the issue
on establishment of veterinary faculty in National Strategy Zone
in Imabari city, its discussion, and the issue, which is related
with so-called amakudari, or re-employment regulations
violation, should not be discussed in the same line. (buzzing in
hall)
If
you want to connect, well, specific example is director Kiso.
Director Kiso is senior to me, and he is serving as Special
Adviser to Cabinet, well, in addition to the Special Adviser to
Cabinet and serving as director of Kake-gakuen as well. With two
titles, he visited me, well, uh, and sounded out about the
establishment of new veterinary faculty in Kake-gakuen.
I
believe, this approach by OB to a person on active duty, is most
typical problem of amakudari issue, and I did not try to affect
such approach by the director Kiso, on any policy decision.
Well, I made a person in charge to convey the fact of visit, but
I believe that, we should not make such approach to affect such
things as to provide convenience, to ease inspection, or to
soften the attitude, and actually did not happen so.
I
believe to tie the issue of amakudari with the issue on
veterinary faculty is inappropriate.
Aoyama
No, sir, I
believe those two should be connected. That is the most
significant difference, Mr. Maekawa.
Before I ask Mr. Kato last, I'd like to tell.
Recently MEXT released the White Paper on Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology. In the first three pages in the
White Paper, quite exceptional statements was included, that
“all of the members in the ministry reflect seriously about the
organizational problem of amakudari. We apologize the people of
Japan and take the responsibility of the involvement in
structuring of mediation and its operation seriously, therefore
three personals in the duty of undersecretaries, – including
you, Mr. Maekawa – were placed on suspension.” It was stated
like that. I feel that your answer betrayed the statements which
your junior staff wrote in suffering.
Excuse me, one minute left. The witness Mr. Kato, please talk.
Kato
I was a little
bit overwhelming and I might have revealed my mind too much.
But, one thing I
didn't mention. After many things, I was informed about the
press conference of the members of the private sector experts,
of the Advisory Council, National Strategy Meeting on 13th
June, and in Internet, well, uh, not relay broadcasting, well,
what is it called? – oh yes, YouTube, I watched the YouTube, for
1 and half hour, and felt overwhelmingly happy.
Especially it was concluded that this deregulation was decided
in clear and serene. I believe this is the conclusion for this
major incident. This is the most important thing to let the
people know.
I
was interviewed very often, but I am sorry most media cut the
parts what I really wanted to tell except one or two media. I
think the YouTube told everything to the full extent.
*Regarding the time of
establishment, the current stage is in a process under the assumption
that “Regulatory Reform in the shortest time” after designated the area
Imabari city, and it is said this is the
intention of the Prime Minister.
*Deregulation measures and
approving of university establishment are independent procedures, and
the Cabinet Office is in charge of deregulation, while approving of
university establishment in charge of Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). In the approving process of
university establishment, it is conceivable that unexpected situation
(opening in 2018 is not made in time) will happen. If those who are
concerned would accept it the Cabinet Office has no problem.
Handling within the
government
*If it is settled in a way
of decision of National Strategy Zone Advisory Council,
it would be looked like the instruction from
the Prime Minister because the Prime Minister is the Chairperson
of the Council. For the opening in April 2018, it is necessary to
discuss this issue in the Council meeting before the beginning or middle
of November.
*Notice of meeting to
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) and Ministry of
Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) will be made as a matter of fact basis
by the Cabinet Office but it is not possible for the Cabinet Office to
take initiative. It should be done by MEXT to raise the two ministries
onto the same dohyo (sumo ground). It is desirable that Deputy Secretary
calls MEXT, MHLW and MAFF and gives them the instruction.
Party related issue
*Veterinarian is
notice-driven matter therefore no procedures by the Party
(LDP) needed. As for the
party's procedures this is a matter between MEXT and the Party
(LDP) therefore it should be
discussed well with the Policy Research Council. In earlier the Kantei
(Prime Minister's Office) was offended like that “Do not discuss at
party policy committee the issue which is to be handled by the Cabinet.”
At the party committee the
Cabinet can respond to questions but would not satisfy the main issue.
Prime Minister's Office
related
*To the VIPs, including
Chief Cabinet Secretary, Aide to Chief Cabinet Secretary, both Deputy
Chief Cabinet Secretaries, Furutani Assistant Chief Cabinet Secretary,
Izumi Special Adviser to the Prime Minister, an explanation that
“Currently the discussion should be done in one or two months basis.”
was given.